Skip to content

Donna Joy

~ live ♥ love ♥ learn ~

Menu
  • Home
  • FEATURED
    • Featured Perspectives of Residents
    • Featured RECIPES ~ Donna Joy’s Recipes
    • Featured Culinary Arts Galleries
    • Featured Performance-Based Data-Driven Research (TQM)
    • Featured Tourism Public Policy Research
    • Public Policy Featured
    • Featured Total Quality Research
  • Projects
    • Donna’s RESEARCH PROJECTS
    • Tourism
    • Benchmark Reports
    • Arizona Revised Statutes – source
    • Sedona Cultural Park Documented History Trail
      • Sedona Cultural Park
      • Sedona Cultural Park Vote
      • Sedona Cultural Park
  • News & Events
    • Stories
      • Sedona Stories
      • City Related
      • Sedona
      • Sedona Animal Search and Rescue
  • Community Voices
    • Sedona Resident Voices
    • Curiosity
    • Polls
    • Community Polls
    • Sedona
    • Social Media Influence
  • CULINARY GALLERIES
    • Art of Sugar Creative Succulents Cactus Cakes
    • Wow your guests with Delicious Dessert Table
    • Elopement Wedding cakes for Small Weddings
    • Culinary Arts
      • Cake Galleries & Images
    • Donna Joy’s Featured Gallery of Custom Cakes
    • Gourmet Galleries Posts
    • THEME | GROOM | SCUPTLED CAKES GALLERIES
    • Sugar Gallery of Edible Sugar Art be inspired
      • Sugar Art Galleries
    • About Donna Joy
  • RECIPE COLLECTION
    • Donna Joy’s Recipes Collection Index, Categories
    • Appetizer Recipes
    • Breads, Muffins, & Rolls Recipes
    • Dessert Recipes
    • Cake | Cupcake Recipes
    • Cookies | Biscotti | Bars Recipes
    • Frosting, Cake Fillings & Dessert Topping Recipes
    • Gluten Free Recipe Collection
      • Gluten Free Cake Recipes
      • Gluten Free Cookie Recipes
      • Gluten Free Flour
    • Meals & Dinners Recipes
    • Soups, Stews & Chowder Recipes
    • Vegan Recipes
Menu
Home Rule Performance

Home Rule Yes Vote Gives City Your Blank Check

Posted on May 6, 2018May 19, 2025 by Henry Twombly

Sedona City Council wants a Yes on Home Rule vote this August 28 to increase the city budget and taxes over the next four years.

“Council Talks Home Rule” (SRRN 4/18/18) is the first of many upcoming articles geared to convince us residents to vote for Home Rule. “The second public hearing will be held Tuesday April 24, during which council will vote whether or not to place Home Rule on the ballot.” Yet at the end of the next paragraph “The voters last approved a Home Rule expenditure limitation in August 2014. Under state law Home Rule must be placed on the ballot every four years.”

So obviously we are going to be voting on Home Rule this August 28, 2018. Why do they pretend this vote may not happen?

“Alternative expenditure limitation” is really a misnomer because there is no limitation. City Council can spend as much as they want. We just vote on guesstimated future budgets as guidelines, to which the Council does not have to adhere.

In August 2014 we voted for these estimated budgets (the first number in the parenthesis is the state limitation; and the second is the actual budget expenditure):  For 2014-15, residents voted for $34.4m ($25.5m and $30.19m); for 2015-16 $34.4m ($27m and $34.83m); for 2016-17 $32.4m ($23m and $33.97m ); and for 2017-18, $34.1m ($21.9m and 47.7m). The charts below show that there are no limits to what the City Council can do.

In short, voting for Home Rule is like cutting the Council a blank check.

Further into the SRRN article, the unnamed source is quoted: “If Home Rule is not passed this would result in the city’s inability to expend revenues collected to support existing levels of operations and city services. The city would be required to reduce or eliminate programs, services and capital projects [around 50 percent] to comply with the state-imposed expenditure limitation.”

Of course fear-mongering is to be expected from the City and the SRRN. In any other year, 50% would have been a gross exaggeration; but, because of this year’s $47.7m budget, its guesstimate is closer to the truth. More importantly, let’s look at the “services” and “programs” that the City provides us residents compared to our neighboring communities. Check out the chart below.

Benchmark Comparison Municipalities Services 2018

Benchmark Comparison Municipalities Services home Rule

As you can see, the City provides Sedona residents with only two: Police and Wastewater.

Actually I only consider it one. The City funds and oversees the Sedona Police Department and I commend the SPD for doing a great job serving and protecting our community. But I believe the SPD is getting a little overzealous when it wants to spend money on Sedona Oak Creek School District (SOCSD) classroom surveillance. This also seems like a blurring of budgets and financial responsibilities between the City and the SOCSD.

As for the “programs” the City provides, seven of the eight on its website were related to the Police Department. In general, they were ways to become informed by – and inform the SPD. I interpreted these programs as ways we could help the Police ourselves.

I requested also that the Parks and Recreation Department email me about their programs, but I never got a response. In general, their programs are mostly geared to kids, even though the average age of us residents is 57.

I’m befuddled every time I think of the Wastewater System (WWS) as a “service” when it only “serves” 60% of us residents whose fees finance its operations and, more than that, the City classifies the WWS as an “enterprise fund” which we “enterprisingly fund” as it shrinks its once-promised subsidies to nothing.

Also you have to wonder who is serving whom when you consider this: “While the annualized visitor population represents 55% of the total annualized population, the visitors contribute less than 25% of the funding for operations of the wastewater system. Even considering all funding sources in total, the annualized visitor population only contributes 40%.” (quote from the Proposed 2017-18 Budget)

Furthermore the City is playing a shell game with its finances by using the Wastewater (WW) fund to subsidize various departments of our city government. They justify these appropriations as “charges” to the WWS for the work these (City) departments supposedly do for the WWS.

Check out the chart below, and you will see that the City diverts nearly a million dollars – which could be used to lower our fees, improve our infrastructure and/or pay down our debt. So in reality the WWS is NOT a “service” rather its fees are a disguised property tax.

For more information about Home Rule, I encourage you to check out www.sedonacity.com/Home-Rule-Information.htm and or http://www.secodacity.com/Understanding%20Homerule.htm.

However you choose to do it, I encourage you to educate yourself about Home Rule, so you can make an informed decision, when you vote on August 28. For those of you who will be out of town, please get an absentee ballot or try to vote early by contacting the Yavapai or Coconino Election Commission. But please VOTE!

Henry Twombly
Sedona AZ

Sedona Community Voices Featured Author

May 2018 Letters to editor of multiple Sedona Blog sites.

By: Henry Twombly
Data & Graphs: by Donna Joy

Post navigation

← Did Sedona City Council kick the can down the Road in 2015?
Featured Rustic Tuscan Affordable Wedding Cakes →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

  • Unleash information Sedona, Stop hiding public information
  • Ultimate Vegan Pumpkin Muffins Recipe Best ever
  • Why the Cultural Park Land Should Not Be Destroyed
  • Population Sedona Area Cities – Towns
  • Are Sedona Residents being Manipulated?
A community that involves residents grows together building a balanced community.

Sedona

  • Sedona
  • Community Polls
  • Social Media Influence
  • Sedona Stories
  • Sedona Cultural Park
  • Arizona Revised Statutes – source

Featured Tourism

  • Defining DMO & DMC meanings
  • DMO the right Model for City or Municipality
  • Targeted Marketing direct with customers
  • Sedona City Bed Tax No requirement to market
  • Sedona Chamber NEVER Stopped Marketing Sedona
  • Sedona Chamber is a Private Group
  • Aspiring Inspiring Masculine Energy
  • Local Government Benchmarking
    • Tourism Government Models DMO Benchmark
    • Understanding Tourism Dollars
    • Destination Marketing Programs | Overview & City of Scottsdale
    • City of Prescott Tourism Program

Sedona Cultural Park History

  • Sedona Cultural Park Documented History Trail
  • Sedona Cultural Park Forest Land
  • Sedona Cultural Park Vote
  • Sedona Fact Finds: Sedona Cultural Park & SIFF
  • Sedona Cultural Park

Donna Joy’s Recipes

Donna Joy's Recipes
Donna Joy's Recipes

Benchmark Peer City

  • Tourism Government Models DMO Benchmark
  • Tourism ~ Public Policy Peer Benchmark
  • Arizona Revised Statutes – source
  • Definitions & Reference Guide Sources
  • City Economic Development Advisory Boards Benchmark
  • Tourism
  • Data Driven Snapshot Sedona Tourism Management
  • City of Prescott Tourism Program
  • Destination Marketing Programs | Overview & City of Scottsdale
  • Benchmark Comparisons (QTM)
  • Performance Metrics (TQM)
Donna Joy's Red Sugar Lily Sedona Wedding Cake
Donna Joy's Red Sugar Lily Sedona Wedding Cake is a unique one-of-a-kind custom design. Adorned with a cascade of handcrafted Red Sugar Lilies. Edible Art.

Featured Performance-Based Data-Driven Research (TQM)

  • Data-Driven Research
  • Featured Performance-Based Data-Driven Research (TQM)
  • Featured Total Quality Research
  • Benchmark Comparisons (QTM)
  • Featured Tourism Public Policy Research
  • Featured Tourism Related
  • Public Policy Featured
  • Performance Metrics (TQM)

Latest Comments

  1. John on TRAFFIC JAMS NO FAULT OF RESIDENTS
  2. Donna Joy on TRAFFIC JAMS NO FAULT OF RESIDENTS
  3. Linda M. on TRAFFIC JAMS NO FAULT OF RESIDENTS

Tourism Related

  • Defining DMO & DMC meanings
  • DMO the right Model for City or Municipality
  • Targeted Marketing direct with customers
  • Sedona City Bed Tax No requirement to market
  • Sedona Chamber NEVER Stopped Marketing Sedona
  • Sedona Chamber is a Private Group
  • Aspiring Inspiring Masculine Energy
  • Local Government Benchmarking
    • Tourism Government Models DMO Benchmark
    • Understanding Tourism Dollars
    • Destination Marketing Programs | Overview & City of Scottsdale
    • City of Prescott Tourism Program

Featured Projects

  • FEATURED
  • Tourism
  • Sedona Cultural Park
  • Arizona Revised Statutes – source
  • Curiosity
  • Sedona Stories
  • Social Media Influence
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

Public Policy Peer Benchmark

  • Tourism Government Models DMO Benchmark
  • Tourism ~ Public Policy Peer Benchmark
  • Arizona Revised Statutes – source
  • Definitions & Reference Guide Sources
  • City Economic Development Advisory Boards Benchmark
  • Tourism
  • Data Driven Snapshot Sedona Tourism Management
  • City of Prescott Tourism Program
  • Destination Marketing Programs | Overview & City of Scottsdale
  • Benchmark Comparisons (QTM)
  • Performance Metrics (TQM)

Recent Posts

  • Unleash information Sedona, Stop hiding public information
  • Ultimate Vegan Pumpkin Muffins Recipe Best ever
  • Why the Cultural Park Land Should Not Be Destroyed
  • Population Sedona Area Cities – Towns
  • Are Sedona Residents being Manipulated?

Donna Joy’s Cake Galleries

Sugar Flowers, Donna Joy Sedona Sweet Arts
Three tier Wedding Cake, Offset squares, with fondant frosting champagne colored buttercream swirls, Adorned with Donna Joy’s hand sculpted Pastillage assorted sugar Red Roses, Calla Lilies Champagne color sugar berries and greens.
  • Sedona Wedding Cakes
  • Cake Galleries & Images
  • Donna Joy’s Featured Gallery of Custom Cakes
  • Wedding Cakes
  • CULINARY GALLERIES
  • Donna Joy’s Recipes Collection Index, Categories
  • Starry Nights Star Themed Wedding cakes
  • Affordable Buttercream Wedding Cakes ideas
  • Featured Rustic Tuscan Affordable Wedding Cakes
© 2026 Donna Joy | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme